What are organizations currently using today or considering the use of in 2022-2023 in terms of email protection - Spam, Malware, URL Phishing, Scamming, Spear Phishing, Domain Impersonation, Brand Impersonation, Lateral Phishing, or Account Takeover.  What are some of the reasons you selected a solution? Deployment, Cost, overall effectiveness/capabilities, support, research and development/investments in product or solution delivery related.

Proofpoint31%

Mimecast44%

Azure Threat/Advanced Threat Protection55%

Barracuda Email Protection - Advanced/Premium18%

Other - Comments5%

497 PARTICIPANTS
4.4k viewscircle icon2 Upvotescircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
Chief Information Officer in Government2 years ago

https://abnormalsecurity.com/

Director of IT in Energy and Utilities2 years ago

Have more than one.  One is more of a general filter and one is more of a specific target hunter type of a thing.

Director of IT in Software4 years ago

My opinion on the products above:

Used Baracuda in the past, a solid cost-effective product.

Using ATP at the moment, ok product, the nicest thing it's there with o365 no external integration.
Proofpoint - probably best product but also most expensive.
Mimecast - Almost as good as Proofpoint, at least twice cheaper.

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Read only19%

Limited admin (eg. Backup, infrastructure, cloud, storage, helpdesk, general)44%

Super admin45%

Security and governance29%

Manager access22%

Application owner26%

Department admin (eg. Finance, HR, operations)13%

Developer admin12%

QA admin9%

Service/support admin9%

Other/custom2%

View Results

I believe Ethics and Ethical Principles as well as a Resposible approach is mandatory, I can wait the adoption for them.21%

I believe the Responsible and Ethical adoption of the technology is important but business is business... 44%

I have no opinion about22%

I don't think they should stop the progress36%

I don't think at all they should be part of the equation1%

View Results