Which privacy KPIs does your company measure?

KPIs, Metrics & ReportingData Privacy

Brand trust27%

Transparency64%

Regulatory compliance53%

DSAR volumes17%

None, we don't have privacy related KPIs8%

223 PARTICIPANTS
1.9k viewscircle icon1 Comment
Sort by:
Chief Privacy Officer in Finance (non-banking)a year ago

we are also measuring, program maturity (using Gartner), number of incidents, number of complaints, number of High Risk ROPA (after mitigations) and ROPA refresh level.

Content you might like

What are the biggest technical challenges preventing organizations from being able to use their existing data to enable digital transformation?

Finding data and putting it to good use13%

Controlling the security and privacy of data45%

Understanding how data is currently being used20%

All of the above19%

None of the above1%

View Results

What's your most indispensable cloud infrastructure tools to use in addition to what you get from GCP, AWS, Azure?

HashiCorp (Terraform, Vault, Packer, etc.)22%

Cloud infra automation (Ansible, Puppet, Chef, etc.)56%

APM (Datadog, AppD, SignalFX, NewRelic, etc.)10%

Others?10%

View Results

Which cybersecurity metrics do you currently use with your board?

Read More Comments

We use Microsoft PowerBI extensively at the company. Over 15,000 reports.
For our "corporate" reports, like financials or HR, we centralize those requests and attend them with my team.
We currently "extract" information from multiple systems (ie. SAP, SuccessFactors, CRM, etc...) and put in into a SQL Analysis Services. For interpreting the data we have a Semantics model in PBI.
The problem I see is we can't scale enough to comply with the reporting demands as the semantic model is "unique" and we end up having only one or two developers that can work at a time. 
Anyone has an idea how to scale their PBI teams without having to redevelop the semantic model per report?

AI and Research in Marketing and Communications: How Are You Ensuring Quality and Truth Over Speed? As AI becomes embedded in our day-to-day marketing operations, from customer insight to content strategy, it’s clear we’re gaining speed and scale. But are we sacrificing veracity and quality of output in the process? One of the biggest challenges I'm seeing is the rise of hallucinated content in AI-generated research.   - How do we ensure AI systems are surfacing trustworthy, contextually accurate, and well-sourced information? - Are we building enough verification layers into our AI-driven content and research workflows? - And how are you educating teams (and execs) to challenge AI outputs, rather than accept them at face value? - What frameworks, tools, or governance models have you adopted to maintain integrity and depth in AI-led research and insight creation? - Have you had success (or struggles) balancing speed vs. substance in AI-powered strategies? Your thoughts, examples, and recommendations would be incredibly valuable in helping others try to navigate this shift responsibly.