How does Google Gemini compare to Microsoft Copilot in terms of capabilities, integration, and performance for productivity and enterprise use cases?

498 viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
Founder in Finance (non-banking)6 months ago

Completely agree with Ricardo. The most important question is whether your company is a Google or Microsoft shop for a couple of reasons:

- The delta between the Gemini models and Copilot's underlying models (i.e. OpenAI) in raw performance is in my experience significantly less material than the level of alignment and grounding you'll enjoy thanks to better integration with your company's data.
- The internal corporate frictions / compliance scrutiny you might face at the vast majority of organizations when attempting to introducing AI from a 'different shop' tends to not be worth the hassle. 

Director of Data in Manufacturing6 months ago

In terms of capabilities, Google Gemini has more services than Microsoft Copilot like Real-Time Web Access, Voice Integration and a better Multimodal Input mode. However only if you are using Gemini as part of your Google Workspace you benefit of some integration. In the other hand, Copilot is totally integrated with your Office 365. Therefore the decision should be based more in which workspace you use (Google or Microsoft) - for standalone LLM, GenAI prompts, Gemini can be better than Copilot due to its real-time web access feature.

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Yes42%

No, we are staying centralized52%

No, we are already decentralized3%

Not sure1%

View Results

Brand or reputational damage to the company 13%

Loss of institutional knowledge 25%

Inconsistent AI output quality 25%

Lower staff morale 13%

Employee attrition 13%

Unforeseen AI costs

None – risks are minimal 13%

Other

View Results