Have you ever encountered issues with the built-in automated testing of low-code/no-code tools? How did you solve the problems you ran into?

Quality, Testing and Security Automation

846 views3 Comments

Sort by:

Director of IT in Manufacturing2 years ago

Manual testing still plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality of your low-code/no-code applications, If the built-in testing capabilities of your low-code/no-code platform are limited, consider utilizing external testing tools and frameworks that can integrate with your applications, Look for tools that offer integration options or provide APIs for interacting with your low-code/no-code applications.

CIO in Education2 years ago

We are still in the early adoptive stages of low/no-code tools. So far, we have not run into any issues, maybe because our applications are not very "heavy" on resources.

VP of IT in Finance (non-banking)2 years ago

Yes, multiple times. The ovecame it by using customized templates and API integrations.

Content you might like

What is your view on Agentic Automation?

Too much vendor hype — no practical use cases12%

Real usable form of AI agents are far from reality33%

Do not need it in next 2-3 years16%

Will use in next 2-3 years20%

Already using it16%

Do not understand what it means3%

View Results

In event driven architecture based on kafka, do you allow "test event" in production topic? If so, how do you effectively manage the downstream impact of the "test event"?

Do you have infrastructure automation engineers on staff in your org? What is their main focus?

How well integrated is testing into your internal self-service platforms? Do you have any plans to add more QA capabilities?

Are you using GitOps in your organization?

Yes, we are GitOps mature18%

Yes, in some instances46%

No, we don't have a use-case for it19%

No, it's too expensive or cumbersome5%

No, and I'm unfamiliar with the term "GitOps"10%

View Results