What are some of the benefits of working for a startup vs. an established company? Are there any?

Strategy & ArchitectureProcess Management
3.8k viewscircle icon30 Upvotescircle icon27 Comments
Sort by:
CSO in Media2 years ago

Huge benefits on working for a start-up - especially when considering the stage of your career. 
The one big benefit of big corporate used to be "job security" -- but that is out the window now in my view, especially in tech. 

Lightbulb on1
Head of Sales in Software2 years ago

Having spent time in three different startups, I can tell you firsthand that it's an extraordinary journey. The immense influence you wield, the rapid-fire learning opportunities, and the quickened pace of career progression are all powerful incentives. And of course, if the financial aspect aligns with your aspirations, including the potential equity upside, I honestly believe it's a path worth pursuing. Although, I must admit, my perspective may be somewhat skewed in favor of startups.

But let's pivot. If you envision your work life as more of a traditional "job", one that doesn't consume most of your waking hours, you might find a larger, more established company to be a better fit. After all, we all resonate with different environments and career paths. So, here's to finding the right stroke for you!

Principle Consultant in IT Services2 years ago

For me, working for a startup, there was always something new going on and a lot of change. From a technologist point of view, I enjoyed learning and solving new problems in new situations all the time.

In an established company, you get more steady, consistent work and usually a lot more certainty in what you will be doing from day to day.

CTO in Transportation2 years ago

If you like to go from idea to product or done fast start ups should be better. If you like to wear many hats and get your hands dirty and enjoy lean processes, start ups are also good for that.

Executive2 years ago

when you work for a startup you can learn a lot of many technology fields also you can easily move to other areas, but when you are in a established companyis easier to focus in an specialty of technology 

Content you might like

What are the biggest technical challenges preventing organizations from being able to use their existing data to enable digital transformation?

Finding data and putting it to good use13%

Controlling the security and privacy of data45%

Understanding how data is currently being used20%

All of the above19%

None of the above1%

View Results

As technology leaders, where are you seeing the most challenges or gaps?

Executive Support10%

Projects vs. Operations68%

Building a culture of Security15%

Team Completeness5%

View Results

I am new to managing an inside sales organization (chemical manufacturing B2B). I would like to offer some training on inside selling skills to a team of 12 (techniques, best practices). I am wondering if anyone would be interested in sharing their perspectives or if you have had success with a third-party training company. 

Does someone have advice on how they have balanced the risk/reward as it relates to introducing Open-Source Software to organization? My org is dipping its toe into the OSS world and the architecture and risk governance teams are looking to get ahead of these requests by coming up with policies and standards for OSS technology being brought into our environment. To clarify, this is not for software development and CI/CD pipelines, SDLC etc. This is for installing solutions that already exist out there (Zabbix, GreyLog, Prometheus etc.) into the organization's environment. We are looking to provide a balance on the obvious risk with the ability to move fast (like everyone else now).

Which vendor solutions are being considered to "read, identify and redact information" in unstructured data sets? I'm specifically looking at solutions that can mask / redact or hide content within documents, that allow documents to be consumed but certain piece of information to be hidden.