How confident are you in letting AI agents take autonomous actions after a SIEM or XDR alert? Are you using them today? If not, what’s holding you back?

1.3k viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon7 Comments
Sort by:
Chief Product Officer in IT Services3 days ago

It's better to take a phased approach rather than shifting completely to autonomous actions right away. Start with automating repeatable tasks—like blocking known malicious IOCs detected on the network. Once that’s in place, you can move on to handling things like unauthorized scans or connection attempts. Often, the way an organization operates requires fine-tuning of SIEM and XDR tools to fully understand the business context and avoid false positives.

CISO| Legal & Regulatory APAC lead in Media9 days ago

From My experience, teams are cautiously optimistic about letting AI take autonomous actions after SIEM or XDR alerts due to False positive. Some already use it for low-risk tasks like isolating endpoints, but full automation is often held back by fear of false positives, lack of trust, or compliance concerns. Its better to have Human in the loop 

CMO in Software10 days ago

Our customers are selectively using AI agents for niche use cases and majority are taking an augmented approach.

CISO in Software10 days ago

We still require human assisted actions.

CISO in Education16 days ago

AI tools have a certain error rate. Research your tool's range, and if you can afford those errors, go ahead. I generally check other non-AI tools as well, and if it matches, then I trust it.

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Yes65%

No35%

Not concerned at all8%

Slightly concerned49%

Moderately concerned26%

Significantly concerned14%

It’s our top priority1%

View Results