I would like to know how other organizations are adopting Microsoft. Copilot Studio. Some questions I have are: 1. Should we allow every employee to use Copilot Studio as a DIY tool or should it be restricted to Software Developers only? 2. What guardrails and policies should we put in place before implementing Copilot Studio? 3. Are you using Copilot Studio and if yes, what is your feedback in terms of productivity gains and any other concerns?
Sort by:
In considering the adoption of Microsoft Copilot Studio, it may be essential to implement a robust risk management system, particularly regarding sensitive data. Here are my thoughts on the questions posed:
1. Access Control: Initially, it may be prudent to limit usage to selected Software Developers. This approach can help mitigate risks associated with sensitive information and ensure that the tool is used effectively by those with the necessary technical expertise.
2. Guardrails and Policies: Establishing clear policies on data usage, access permissions, and compliance monitoring is crucial. This will help ensure safe implementation and adherence to organizational standards.
3. Scalable Approach: It is important to gather feedback from early users to assess productivity gains and address any concerns. This step-by-step approach will facilitate a scalable and secure integration of the tool.
Additionally, it may be necessary to implement Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to monitor the impact of Copilot Studio in a structured manner. This will allow organizations to evaluate its effectiveness and make informed decisions as they expand its use.
not using copilot studio , sorry!
Our team has used Microsoft Copilot in a few different settings. From a productivity standpoint, it really helps speed up development, especially for repetitive tasks and boilerplate code. For junior developers, it’s also a big win since it reduces the learning curve. That said, I did notice that the generated code isn’t always optimized or up-to-date with best practices, so the team spent some extra time reviewing and refactoring it. In terms of performance, I'd say it's a mixed bag—it definitely boosts productivity, but the quality of code can sometimes suffer, which requires some balancing. If evaluating such tools, I’d recommend tracking time spent on coding tasks and reviewing code quality to get a clearer picture.