Have you experienced more success showcasing the business value of IT from a storytelling perspective or with specific metrics?

Need both29%

Storytelling (Competitive advantage, risk mitigation, innovation/agility)47%

Metrics (ROI, TCO, NPV, etc.)24%

Neither

66 PARTICIPANTS
434 viewscircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
Chief Information Officer15 days ago

In my experience, both is best. Data provides the facts and trends, narrative the analysis, context and richness. Agree with Stefan, non-financial metrics are also useful to illustrate the breadth of many IT organisations as well as business integration (eg staff completion rates of cyber training).

Chief Information Officer in Manufacturing20 days ago

Metrics are always powerful, but they don't always need to be direct financial metrics (ROI, TCO) - they can be proxy KPIs as proof points that the "story" is real. E.g. % of x events fully automated. It also helps isolate the measure to the IT contribution, whereas financial realization may require broader dependencies (e.g. organizational restructures etc). 

Content you might like

Executive Support10%

Projects vs. Operations68%

Building a culture of Security15%

Team Completeness5%

View Results

Insufficient integrations34%

Valuable features are complex to use37%

Rigid and non-customizable/configurable48%

Support and service are hard to access / benefit from34%

Expensive compared to alternatives20%

Other (please comment)7%

View Results