What is your opinion on setting up an "Incident Response Retainer" with an IR service provider?

1.5k viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
SVP, Director of Cyber Defense in Banking17 days ago

This is essential to have before a major incident occurs.  You don't want to be engaged in a vendor management process or legal oversight process when in the middle of an incident.  Additionally, the retainers are pretty flexible as the hours you pre-purchased can normally be turned into service hours before they expire....ie, assessments, table top exercises, red/blue teams, etc.

VP of IT in Manufacturinga month ago

It is always a good option to have for that difficult day.  In a real incident situation, SOC is swamped and can be greatly helped by having IR specialists taking over.  There are many service providers in the market and some are top of the league.  Depending on the budget, you should choose.

1 Reply
no title22 days ago

thank you Gomeet

Content you might like

Yes51%

No42%

Uncertain5%

View Results

Yes - Maine did the right thing. There are too many security risks with free versions of these tools. Not enough copyright or privacy protections of data.23%

No, but.... - You must have good security and privacy policies in place for ChatGPT (and other GenAI apps). My organization has policies and meaningful ways to enforce those policies and procedures for staff.44%

No - Bans simply don't work. Even without policies, this action hurts innovation and sends the wrong message to staff and the world about our organization.24%

I'm not sure. This action by Maine makes me think. Let me get back to you in a few weeks (or months).8%

View Results