Content James is Following

How would you describe data quality processes in your organization?

Data & AnalyticsDatabase

There is no structured methods but do it adhoc depending on business needs

There is no check & balances

Mature processes, having dedicated Data Governance & steward and Data QA practices handles Data Quality

Business manages it on their own way

View Results
1.7k viewscircle iconLightbulb on1 Upvotecircle icon1 Comment

Do you believe that (RPA, Automation, and intelligent Automation), coupled with clear guidelines, robust process mapping, and effective monitoring and control capabilities, can serve as a key enabler for successfully integrating AI and GenAI into an organization's operations and strategies?

AI & Machine LearningGenerative AI

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

View Results
46.2k viewscircle iconLightbulb on4 Upvotescircle icon9 Comments

What experiences have you had with AI Guardrails across Google Gemini (for Workspaces). We’re concerned about amplifying access to sensitive files (I.e. access already exists but Gemini now surfaces insights from these files so much more readily). We'll tighten up access controls and likely implement Google Workspace AI Classification, but we’re also considering selecting and implementing an AI Guardrails vendor. Which vendors do people have experiences with? Aporia, Arize, Bedrock, Databricks, Guardrails AI, IBM, Nvidia, Whylabs Which features were most relevant and useable? Bias Mitigation, Explainability, Data Privacy, Security, Regulatory Compliance Is a vendor needed? Could a homespun collection of Gems suffice?

AI & Machine Learning
1.7k viewscircle iconLightbulb on2 Upvotes

How in your career have you been able to “jolt” stalled IT projects into full production? Particularly looking for advice on generating momentum for D&A and AI rollouts.

Portfolio, Program & Project ManagementProject Management
James KnappVP, Strategy & Architecture in Media5 months ago

Land a pilot/POC that people care about and are willing to advocate for as the stepping stone to your broader rollout. 

Lightbulb on2
Read More Comments
2.2k viewscircle iconLightbulb on1 Upvotecircle icon4 Comments

SAP continues to drive 'Clean the Core' or more recently 'Cleaner Core'. Besides removal of unnecessary or unused WRICEF code (a waste of time effort in my eyes), looking for any real clean you have done and found beneficial.  One thought we have had is to move off some of the SAP capability and move to SaaS solutions integrated via an orchestration layer. Thus reducing our SAP footprint and moving us towards a viable S/4 upgrade. Any thoughts on this 'cleaning' approach?

Applications & PlatformsStrategy & Architecture
James KnappVP, Strategy & Architecture in Media3 months ago

Thanks. Likewise I would like to know how we can DIY clean core rather than engage PS

1 Reply
1.8k viewscircle iconLightbulb on1 Upvotecircle icon2 Comments
James Knapp, VP, Strategy & Architecture at Nielsen | Gartner Peer Community